A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris

Craig Longmore, Kate Fogarty, Francis Neat, Deirdre Brophy, Clive Trueman, Andrew Milton, Stefano Mariani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of the morphological and chemical characteristics of otoliths have recently been proposed as complementary tools for fish stock identification. However, their effectiveness remains to be fully assessed, especially in species whose life history is still poorly understood. The relative efficiency of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis in discriminating samples of the deep-sea macrourid Coryphaenoides rupestris collected in different areas in the North Atlantic was examined. Otolith microchemistry based on LA/ICP-MS found significant differences in the concentrations of lithium, manganese and barium among sample sites. This allowed for very high classification accuracy (92%), when using discriminant function analysis. Otolith shape analysis based both on linear shape measurements and elliptical fourier analysis revealed a contrasting weak discrimination, with only 43% classification success. Otolith microchemistry appears to be a more effective tool in identifying individual fish from different locations. The implications for the study of population structure are discussed taking into account the limitations of the methodologies employed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-605
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Biology of Fishes
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Keywords

  • Elliptic Fourier Analysis
  • Fisheries management
  • ICP-MS
  • North Atlantic
  • Roundnose Grenadier
  • Stock structure
  • Trace elements

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of otolith microchemistry and otolith shape analysis for the study of spatial variation in a deep-sea teleost, Coryphaenoides rupestris'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this