A comparison of the efficacy of pond-net and box sampling methods in turloughs - Irish ephemeral aquatic systems

Áine O Connor, Stephen Bradish, Thomas Reed, James Moran, Eugenie Regan, Marjolein Visser, Mike Gormally, Micheline Sheehy Skeffington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two methods were used to sample aquatic macroinvertebrates in three turloughs. Turloughs are systems that flood periodically from groundwater, in response to local rainfall patterns and contain rare aquatic species and assemblages. The first method used a standard pond net that was swept through the water column, while the second involved fixing a rectangular, open-bottomed box to the substrata and removing all organisms with a net. Similar overall sampling effort was applied to each method and individual box samples were found to take longer to gather than pond net samples. The box method, however, gave the maximum yield for a given sampling effort. Significantly more beetle species and individuals were recorded per unit area of bottom at all three turloughs using the box method. Multivariate analysis segregated samples, firstly according to site and secondly, with respect to method. The box method is a viable alternative to sampling with a pond net. It is more quantitative, objective, specific and reliable. This is particularly important in habitats distinguished by rare species and assemblages, and for which monitoring is driven by legislative needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-144
Number of pages12
JournalHydrobiologia
Volume524
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • box method
  • littoral macroinvertebrates
  • pond net
  • turloughs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the efficacy of pond-net and box sampling methods in turloughs - Irish ephemeral aquatic systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this