A critical evaluation of thewater supply and stormwater management performance of retrofittable domestic rainwater harvesting systems

Ruth Quinn, Peter Melville-Shreeve, David Butler, Virginia Stovin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rainwater harvesting systems are often used as both an alternative water source and a stormwater management tool. Many studies have focused on the water-saving potential of these systems, but research into aspects that impact stormwater retention-such as demand patterns and climate change-is lacking. This paper investigates the short-term impact of demand on both water supply and stormwater management and examines future and potential performance over a longer time scale using climate change projections. To achieve this, data was collected from domestic rainwater harvesting systems in Broadhempston, UK, and used to create a yield-after-spillage model. The validation process showed that using constant demand as opposed to monitored data had little impact on accuracy. With regards to stormwater management, it was found that monitored households did not use all the non-potable available water, and that increasing their demand for this was the most effective way of increasing retention capacity based on the modelling study completed. Installing passive or active runoff control did not markedly improve performance. Passive systems reduced the outflow to greenfield runoff for the longest time, whereas active systems increased the outflow to a level substantially above roof runoff in the 30 largest events.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1184
JournalWater (Switzerland)
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Domestic rainwater harvesting
  • Stormwater management
  • Water supply

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical evaluation of thewater supply and stormwater management performance of retrofittable domestic rainwater harvesting systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this