TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic inflammation towards cancer incidence
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies
AU - Michels, Nathalie
AU - van Aart, Carola
AU - Morisse, Jens
AU - Mullee, Amy
AU - Huybrechts, Inge
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - This systematic review and meta-analysis provides epidemiological data on the relationship between chronic inflammation, as measured by inflammatory blood parameters, and cancer incidence. Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Web Of Science and Embase databases until October 2020. In vitro studies, animal studies, studies with chronically-ill subjects or cross-sectional studies were excluded. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The 59 nested case-control, 6 nested case-cohort and 42 prospective cohort studies considered 119 different inflammatory markers (top three: CRP, fibrinogen and IL6) and 26 cancer types (top five: colorectal, lung, breast, overall and prostate cancer). Nineteen meta-analyses resulted in ten significant positive associations: CRP-breast (OR = 1.23[1.05–1.43];HR = 1.14[1.01–1.28)), CRP-colorectal (OR = 1.34[1.11–1.60]), CRP-lung (HR = 2.03[1.59–2.60]), fibrinogen-lung (OR = 2.56[1.86–3.54]), IL6-lung (OR = 1.41[1.12–1.78]), CRP-ovarian (OR = 1.41[1.10–1.80]), CRP-prostate (HR = 1.09[1.03–1.15]), CRP-overall (HR = 1.35[1.16–1.57]) and fibrinogen-overall (OR = 1.22[1.07–1.39]). Study quality improvements can be done by better verification of inflammatory status (more than one baseline measurement of one parameter), adjusting for important confounders and ensuring long-term follow-up.
AB - This systematic review and meta-analysis provides epidemiological data on the relationship between chronic inflammation, as measured by inflammatory blood parameters, and cancer incidence. Two independent researchers searched PubMed, Web Of Science and Embase databases until October 2020. In vitro studies, animal studies, studies with chronically-ill subjects or cross-sectional studies were excluded. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The 59 nested case-control, 6 nested case-cohort and 42 prospective cohort studies considered 119 different inflammatory markers (top three: CRP, fibrinogen and IL6) and 26 cancer types (top five: colorectal, lung, breast, overall and prostate cancer). Nineteen meta-analyses resulted in ten significant positive associations: CRP-breast (OR = 1.23[1.05–1.43];HR = 1.14[1.01–1.28)), CRP-colorectal (OR = 1.34[1.11–1.60]), CRP-lung (HR = 2.03[1.59–2.60]), fibrinogen-lung (OR = 2.56[1.86–3.54]), IL6-lung (OR = 1.41[1.12–1.78]), CRP-ovarian (OR = 1.41[1.10–1.80]), CRP-prostate (HR = 1.09[1.03–1.15]), CRP-overall (HR = 1.35[1.16–1.57]) and fibrinogen-overall (OR = 1.22[1.07–1.39]). Study quality improvements can be done by better verification of inflammatory status (more than one baseline measurement of one parameter), adjusting for important confounders and ensuring long-term follow-up.
KW - Cancer
KW - Cytokines
KW - Inflammatory markers
KW - Observational studies
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096854465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103177
DO - 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103177
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33264718
AN - SCOPUS:85096854465
SN - 1040-8428
VL - 157
JO - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
JF - Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
M1 - 103177
ER -