TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of physiological responses to open water kayaking and kayak ergometry
AU - Van Someren, K. A.
AU - Phillips, G. R.W.
AU - Palmer, G. S.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - This study compared the physiological responses of simulated kayaking on a K1 ERGO kayak ergometer with open water paddling. Nine well-trained male kayakers (V̇O2peak 4.27 ± 0.58 L/min-1, age 24 ± 4 yr, mass 77.3 ± 6.4 kg, height 179.5 ± 5.3 cm; [mean ± SD]) performed two 4 min exercise bouts on open water (OW) and on an air braked kayak ergometer (Erg). During exercise, expired air and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured. The distance covered during OW (992 ± 47.1 m) was highly correlated (r2=0.86) with the total work performed in Erg (47.64 ± 7.67 kj). There were no differences between trials for oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production or estimated carbohydrate oxidation. However, during OW, minute ventilation was significantly higher at 60 and 90 s (104.2 ± 16.4 vs. 92.6 ± 20.4 L/min-1 and 120.5 ± 15.8 vs. 111.7 ± 17.6 L/min-1 for 60 and 90 s, respectively, p < 0.05), and HR was higher in OW during the first minute (120 ± 20 vs. 104 ± 19 beats/min-1, 164 ± 8 vs. 147 ± 18 beats/min-1 and 178 ± 6 vs. 170 ± 7 beats/min-1 for 0, 30, 60 s, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in peak V̇O2 between OW and Erg (4.10 ± 0.49 vs. 4.09 ± 0.53 L/min-1, respectively) nor in post-exercise blood (lactate) (6.43 ± 1.47 vs. 6.59 ± 0.99 mmol/L-1, respectively). We conclude that the K1 ERGO accurately simulates the physiological demands of short-term, high-intensity kayaking.
AB - This study compared the physiological responses of simulated kayaking on a K1 ERGO kayak ergometer with open water paddling. Nine well-trained male kayakers (V̇O2peak 4.27 ± 0.58 L/min-1, age 24 ± 4 yr, mass 77.3 ± 6.4 kg, height 179.5 ± 5.3 cm; [mean ± SD]) performed two 4 min exercise bouts on open water (OW) and on an air braked kayak ergometer (Erg). During exercise, expired air and heart rate (HR) were continuously measured. The distance covered during OW (992 ± 47.1 m) was highly correlated (r2=0.86) with the total work performed in Erg (47.64 ± 7.67 kj). There were no differences between trials for oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production or estimated carbohydrate oxidation. However, during OW, minute ventilation was significantly higher at 60 and 90 s (104.2 ± 16.4 vs. 92.6 ± 20.4 L/min-1 and 120.5 ± 15.8 vs. 111.7 ± 17.6 L/min-1 for 60 and 90 s, respectively, p < 0.05), and HR was higher in OW during the first minute (120 ± 20 vs. 104 ± 19 beats/min-1, 164 ± 8 vs. 147 ± 18 beats/min-1 and 178 ± 6 vs. 170 ± 7 beats/min-1 for 0, 30, 60 s, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no differences in peak V̇O2 between OW and Erg (4.10 ± 0.49 vs. 4.09 ± 0.53 L/min-1, respectively) nor in post-exercise blood (lactate) (6.43 ± 1.47 vs. 6.59 ± 0.99 mmol/L-1, respectively). We conclude that the K1 ERGO accurately simulates the physiological demands of short-term, high-intensity kayaking.
KW - Laboratory assessment
KW - Performance
KW - Validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034062914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-2000-8877
DO - 10.1055/s-2000-8877
M3 - Article
C2 - 10834353
AN - SCOPUS:0034062914
SN - 0172-4622
VL - 21
SP - 200
EP - 204
JO - International Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - International Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 3
ER -