Criteria for assessing maturity of skulls in the common dolphin, Delphinus sp., from New Zealand waters

Friederike F.J. Jordan, Sinéad Murphy, Emmanuelle Martinez, Christophe Amiot, Anton van Helden, Karen A. Stockin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Knowledge about the maturity status of specimens included in evolutionary, taxonomic or life history investigations is fundamentally important. This study investigated the use of the degree of cranial suture fusion, the developmental status of cranial bones, and the degree of tooth wear as indicators for cranial maturity status in Delphinus sp. from New Zealand waters. In total, 15 sutures, one joint and three nonmetric characters were assessed on 66 skulls obtained from stranded and bycaught individuals sampled between 1932 and 2011. A suture index (SI) was computed based on 10 sutures, in which degree of fusion was correlated with age and the three misclassification indices (MI), calculated for a given suture, were <50%. In addition to these, five premaxilla-maxilla fusion and seven tooth wear categories were assessed. Results suggest that New Zealand Delphinus sp. skulls should be regarded as cranially mature if at least two of the following criteria are met: (1) individuals assessed as sexually mature, (2) aged ≥ 11 yr, (3) SI ≥ 8, and (4) premaxilla-maxilla fusion ≥ 75% of the length of the dorsal side of the rostrum. Presence of any number of rostral teeth worn to the gum line provided further evidence for cranial maturity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1077-1097
Number of pages21
JournalMarine Mammal Science
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Common dolphin
  • Cranial maturity
  • Delphinus
  • Premaxilla-maxilla fusion
  • Suture index
  • Tooth wear

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria for assessing maturity of skulls in the common dolphin, Delphinus sp., from New Zealand waters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this