TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a framework of minimum standards for the risk assessment of alien species
AU - Roy, Helen E.
AU - Rabitsch, Wolfgang
AU - Scalera, Riccardo
AU - Stewart, Alan
AU - Gallardo, Belinda
AU - Genovesi, Piero
AU - Essl, Franz
AU - Adriaens, Tim
AU - Bacher, Sven
AU - Booy, Olaf
AU - Branquart, Etienne
AU - Brunel, Sarah
AU - Copp, Gordon Howard
AU - Dean, Hannah
AU - D'hondt, Bram
AU - Josefsson, Melanie
AU - Kenis, Marc
AU - Kettunen, Marianne
AU - Linnamagi, Merike
AU - Lucy, Frances
AU - Martinou, Angeliki
AU - Moore, Niall
AU - Nentwig, Wolfgang
AU - Nieto, Ana
AU - Pergl, Jan
AU - Peyton, Jodey
AU - Roques, Alain
AU - Schindler, Stefan
AU - Schönrogge, Karsten
AU - Solarz, Wojciech
AU - Stebbing, Paul D.
AU - Trichkova, Teodora
AU - Vanderhoeven, Sonia
AU - van Valkenburg, Johan
AU - Zenetos, Argyro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Biological invasions are a threat to biodiversity, society and the economy. There is an urgent need to provide evidence-based assessments of the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) to prioritize action. Risk assessments underpin IAS policies in many ways: informing legislation; providing justification of restrictions in trade or consumer activities; prioritizing surveillance and rapid response. There are benefits to ensuring consistency in content of IAS risk assessments globally, and this can be achieved by providing a framework of minimum standards as a checklist for quality assurance. From a review of existing risk assessment protocols, and with reference to the requirements of the EU Regulation on IAS (1143/2014) and international agreements including the World Trade Organisation, Convention on Biological Diversity and International Plant Protection Convention, coupled with consensus methods, we identified and agreed upon 14 minimum standards (attributes) a risk-assessment scheme should include. The agreed minimum standards were as follows: (1) basic species description; (2) likelihood of invasion; (3) distribution, spread and impacts; (4) assessment of introduction pathways; (5) assessment of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems; (6) Assessment of impact on ecosystem services; (7) assessment of socio-economic impacts; (8) consideration of status (threatened or protected) of species or habitat under threat; (9) assessment of effects of future climate change; (10) completion possible even when there is a lack of information; (11) documents information sources; (12) provides a summary in a consistent and interpretable form; (13) includes uncertainty; (14) includes quality assurance. In deriving these minimum standards, gaps in knowledge required for completing risk assessments and the scope of existing risk assessment protocols were revealed, most notably in relation to assessing benefits, socio-economic impacts and impacts on ecosystem services but also inclusion of consideration of climate change. Policy implications. We provide a checklist of components that should be within invasive alien species risk assessments and recommendations to develop risk assessments to meet these proposed minimum standards. Although inspired by implementation of the European Union Regulation on invasive alien species, and as such developed specifically within a European context, the derived framework and minimum standards could be applied globally.
AB - Biological invasions are a threat to biodiversity, society and the economy. There is an urgent need to provide evidence-based assessments of the risks posed by invasive alien species (IAS) to prioritize action. Risk assessments underpin IAS policies in many ways: informing legislation; providing justification of restrictions in trade or consumer activities; prioritizing surveillance and rapid response. There are benefits to ensuring consistency in content of IAS risk assessments globally, and this can be achieved by providing a framework of minimum standards as a checklist for quality assurance. From a review of existing risk assessment protocols, and with reference to the requirements of the EU Regulation on IAS (1143/2014) and international agreements including the World Trade Organisation, Convention on Biological Diversity and International Plant Protection Convention, coupled with consensus methods, we identified and agreed upon 14 minimum standards (attributes) a risk-assessment scheme should include. The agreed minimum standards were as follows: (1) basic species description; (2) likelihood of invasion; (3) distribution, spread and impacts; (4) assessment of introduction pathways; (5) assessment of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems; (6) Assessment of impact on ecosystem services; (7) assessment of socio-economic impacts; (8) consideration of status (threatened or protected) of species or habitat under threat; (9) assessment of effects of future climate change; (10) completion possible even when there is a lack of information; (11) documents information sources; (12) provides a summary in a consistent and interpretable form; (13) includes uncertainty; (14) includes quality assurance. In deriving these minimum standards, gaps in knowledge required for completing risk assessments and the scope of existing risk assessment protocols were revealed, most notably in relation to assessing benefits, socio-economic impacts and impacts on ecosystem services but also inclusion of consideration of climate change. Policy implications. We provide a checklist of components that should be within invasive alien species risk assessments and recommendations to develop risk assessments to meet these proposed minimum standards. Although inspired by implementation of the European Union Regulation on invasive alien species, and as such developed specifically within a European context, the derived framework and minimum standards could be applied globally.
KW - European union
KW - biodiversity impacts
KW - biological invasions
KW - consensus methods
KW - invasive alien species
KW - legislation
KW - management
KW - prioritization
KW - risk assessment
KW - socio-economic impacts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034218570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13025
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13025
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85034218570
SN - 0021-8901
VL - 55
SP - 526
EP - 538
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
JF - Journal of Applied Ecology
IS - 2
ER -