TY - JOUR
T1 - Dyslexia policy and practice
T2 - cross-professional and parental perspectives on the Northern Ireland context
AU - Beck, Gillian J.
AU - Hazzard, Donna
AU - McPhillips, Therése
AU - Tiernan, Barbara
AU - Casserly, Ann Marie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 NASEN
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - This article considers policy and practice in relation to dyslexia provision in Northern Ireland since the 2002 Task Group Report. Using interviews with original and current stakeholders, this research, funded by SCoTENS (Standing Conference on Teacher Education, North and South), examined the extent to which recommendations have been met in the intervening years. Perspectives of interviewees indicated that while pockets of good practice have existed, this has been inconsistent. Despite the Department of Education (Northern Ireland) promoting and funding a significant and replicable model of teacher education and making efforts to monitor its efficacy, concerns remain regarding the optional nature of training, the maintenance of the discrepancy model of dyslexia identification, the need for early multi-disciplinary identification, whole-school policy development and post-primary provision. In addition, stakeholders questioned the sustainability of funding and advocated enhanced transparency for parents, whose voices, it would appear, can still go unheard.
AB - This article considers policy and practice in relation to dyslexia provision in Northern Ireland since the 2002 Task Group Report. Using interviews with original and current stakeholders, this research, funded by SCoTENS (Standing Conference on Teacher Education, North and South), examined the extent to which recommendations have been met in the intervening years. Perspectives of interviewees indicated that while pockets of good practice have existed, this has been inconsistent. Despite the Department of Education (Northern Ireland) promoting and funding a significant and replicable model of teacher education and making efforts to monitor its efficacy, concerns remain regarding the optional nature of training, the maintenance of the discrepancy model of dyslexia identification, the need for early multi-disciplinary identification, whole-school policy development and post-primary provision. In addition, stakeholders questioned the sustainability of funding and advocated enhanced transparency for parents, whose voices, it would appear, can still go unheard.
KW - assessment
KW - dyslexia
KW - parental voice
KW - post-primary provision
KW - teacher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021445587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8578.12172
DO - 10.1111/1467-8578.12172
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021445587
SN - 0952-3383
VL - 44
SP - 144
EP - 164
JO - British Journal of Special Education
JF - British Journal of Special Education
IS - 2
ER -