Efficacy testing of novel chemical disinfectants on clinically relevant microbial pathogens

Elaine Meade, Mary Garvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background There has been a dramatic increase in the number of hospital-acquired infections, which is linked to the pandemic of multidrug resistance. Clinical environments provide an ideal reservoir for the growth, proliferation, and transmission of pathogenic organisms, including bacterial and yeast species. Consequently, the need for improved, effective disinfectants is of paramount importance. Methods Studies were conducted to assess the efficacy of chemical disinfectants—peracetic acid and triameen—on microbial strains. Testing included the assessment of antimicrobial and antisporicidal activity of disinfection solutions performed on a range of clinical isolates that pose a high risk for patient morbidity in clinical settings. Results Both chemical disinfectants successfully inactivated all test strains, with peracetic acid showing a greater level of antimicrobial activity. Escherichia coli proved most susceptible when assessed by the Kirby disk diffusion, suspension, and medical suspension assays with the greatest reduction in cell viability achieved. Antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus and Staphylococcus aureus strains showed greatest resistance to both disinfectants. Discussion and conclusions Test chemicals show potential to act as intermediate-level disinfectants inactivating vegetative microorganisms and bacterial spores on clinically relevant strains where they show potential as a preventative measure in relation to nosocomial infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-49
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Antibiotic resistance
  • Disinfection
  • MRSA
  • Nosocomial infection
  • VRE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy testing of novel chemical disinfectants on clinically relevant microbial pathogens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this