TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating different wetland creation approaches for irish cutaway peatlands using water chemical analysis
AU - Lally, Heather
AU - Gormally, Mike
AU - Higgins, Tara
AU - Colleran, Emer
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - By 2030, 75,000 ha of raised bog owned by Ireland's largest peat producer, Bord na Móna, are expected to be exhausted. In an effort to rehabilitate Irish cutaway peatlands to maximise their conservation value, large areas have been converted to wetlands using three alternative approaches: total peat removal (TPR), partial peat removal (PPR), and simple rewetting (SR). This paper assesses the success, to date, of the three wetland creation approaches using hydrochemistry as a measure of restoration success and identifies the key variables influencing hydrochemistry in the created wetlands. Chemical analysis suggests major differences between the TPR and SR wetlands while the PPR wetlands exhibited intermediate characteristics. Additionally, principal component analysis highlighted nitrite, conductivity, turbidity, chlorophyll-a, colour, and soluble reactive phosphorus as important hydrochemical factors determining differences among the three wetland creation approaches. This research shows that wetlands underlain by peaty substrates (PPR and SR) may take longer than 10 years to stabilise hydrochemically compared to those wetlands underlain by solely alkaline sediments (TPR) which stabilise quickly. Although wetland ecosystem development may be slower in the PPR and SR wetlands they hold the greatest potential to develop peat forming habitats. Wetland creation represents a viable and valuable post-harvesting land-uses option for cutaway peatlands.
AB - By 2030, 75,000 ha of raised bog owned by Ireland's largest peat producer, Bord na Móna, are expected to be exhausted. In an effort to rehabilitate Irish cutaway peatlands to maximise their conservation value, large areas have been converted to wetlands using three alternative approaches: total peat removal (TPR), partial peat removal (PPR), and simple rewetting (SR). This paper assesses the success, to date, of the three wetland creation approaches using hydrochemistry as a measure of restoration success and identifies the key variables influencing hydrochemistry in the created wetlands. Chemical analysis suggests major differences between the TPR and SR wetlands while the PPR wetlands exhibited intermediate characteristics. Additionally, principal component analysis highlighted nitrite, conductivity, turbidity, chlorophyll-a, colour, and soluble reactive phosphorus as important hydrochemical factors determining differences among the three wetland creation approaches. This research shows that wetlands underlain by peaty substrates (PPR and SR) may take longer than 10 years to stabilise hydrochemically compared to those wetlands underlain by solely alkaline sediments (TPR) which stabilise quickly. Although wetland ecosystem development may be slower in the PPR and SR wetlands they hold the greatest potential to develop peat forming habitats. Wetland creation represents a viable and valuable post-harvesting land-uses option for cutaway peatlands.
KW - Habitat rehabilitation
KW - Hydrochemistry
KW - Peatland restoration
KW - Restoration success
KW - Rewetting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863727138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13157-011-0257-5
DO - 10.1007/s13157-011-0257-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84863727138
SN - 0277-5212
VL - 32
SP - 129
EP - 136
JO - Wetlands
JF - Wetlands
IS - 1
ER -