TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental validation of numerical heat transfer predictions for single- and multi-component printed circuit boards in natural convection environments
AU - Rodgers, Peter
AU - Eveloy, Valerie
AU - Lohan, John
AU - Fager, Carl Magnus
AU - Tiilikka, Pekka
AU - Rantala, Jukka
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - Increasing power densities and changing component design have increased the need for accurate prediction of temperature effects that may impact on system performance or reliability. To highlight these aspects early in the product development cycle, designers resort to using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based numerical predictive tools. However, users acknowledge that these predictions require experimental verification which is not readily available during the early design phase. Therefore, a need exists to establish well-defined benchmark test cases to help establish confidence in both modelling methodology and numerical tools. This paper presents such information for three package types (SO16, TSOP48, and PQFP208) which are evaluated on single- and multi-component Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs). Benchmark criteria are based on the prediction of steady state component junction temperature and associated component-PCB surface temperature gradients, which are both compared with experimental measurements. While the detailed numerical models typically predicted junction temperature to within 4 °C, discrepancies as great as 9 °C were also recorded. The sensitivity of prediction accuracy was assessed against discretization level and both the thermal conductivity and geometry of package materials. Hence it was considered important that all experimental and numerical modelling details be provided for reference.
AB - Increasing power densities and changing component design have increased the need for accurate prediction of temperature effects that may impact on system performance or reliability. To highlight these aspects early in the product development cycle, designers resort to using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based numerical predictive tools. However, users acknowledge that these predictions require experimental verification which is not readily available during the early design phase. Therefore, a need exists to establish well-defined benchmark test cases to help establish confidence in both modelling methodology and numerical tools. This paper presents such information for three package types (SO16, TSOP48, and PQFP208) which are evaluated on single- and multi-component Printed Circuit Boards (PCBs). Benchmark criteria are based on the prediction of steady state component junction temperature and associated component-PCB surface temperature gradients, which are both compared with experimental measurements. While the detailed numerical models typically predicted junction temperature to within 4 °C, discrepancies as great as 9 °C were also recorded. The sensitivity of prediction accuracy was assessed against discretization level and both the thermal conductivity and geometry of package materials. Hence it was considered important that all experimental and numerical modelling details be provided for reference.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032651072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:0032651072
SN - 1065-2221
SP - 54
EP - 64
JO - Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium
JF - Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium
T2 - Proceedings of the 1999 15th Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium
Y2 - 9 March 1999 through 11 March 1999
ER -