Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hares, juvenile domesticates, structured deposition, and ritual in the Neolithic court tomb at Parknabinnia, Ireland

    • Consultant Zooarchaeologist
    • National University of Ireland, Galway

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The occurrence of animal remains in human mortuary assemblages presents problems of interpretation. Are they post-depositional natural inclusions or are they evidence of deliberate ritual practices? This study uses a contextual taphonomic approach to analyse a remarkable faunal assemblage from a Neolithic megalithic tomb in Ireland. The Parknabinnia court tomb (Cl. 153) is located in the karstic limestone region known as the Burren, resulting in exceptional bone preservation. The excavation yielded substantial quantities of human and animal bone, with the faunal assemblage consisting of over 2000 identified specimens, and dominated by hare (Lepus timidus hibernicus). Dating of these bones shows them to be contemporary with the human remains in the tomb. This study found evidence for the deliberate deposition of both partly dismembered and whole hares in the tomb, as well as the inclusion of young animals of various other species in the deposits. These findings are interpreted as likely to be the result of rituals concerned with fertility and this is supported by a review of folklore associated with hares and other lagomorphs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number102672
    JournalJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
    Volume35
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

    Keywords

    • Contextual taphonomic analysis
    • Dog
    • Domesticate
    • Fertility ritual
    • Hare
    • Ireland
    • Megalith
    • Neolithic
    • Neonate

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hares, juvenile domesticates, structured deposition, and ritual in the Neolithic court tomb at Parknabinnia, Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this