Abstract
This Chapter contextualises atypical sex (intersex, disorder of sex development) within Western society through presenting a broad historical account of atypical sex treatment within biomedical science and how this treatment has led to the emergence of the intersex patient advocacy movement. It begins by exploring the nineteenth century social conditions that led to science’s obsession with sex difference and how scientific observation failed to identify a mechanism for unequivocally delineating all individuals as either male or female but instead repeatedly highlighted sex’s inherent complexity and variance. It continues by describing attempts to maintain a binary understanding of sex focusing on the theory and treatment practices of John Money and his colleagues. Finally it explores how towards the end of the twentieth century, opposition to Money’s treatment practices led to the emergence of the intersex patient advocacy movement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Philosophy and Medicine |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media B.V. |
| Pages | 7-17 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | Philosophy and Medicine |
|---|---|
| Volume | 131 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0376-7418 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2215-0080 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Historical Overview'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver