On using experimentally estimated wall shear stresses to validate numerically predicted results

M. Walsh, T. McGloughlin, D. W. Liepsch, T. O'Brien, L. Morris, A. R. Ansari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to assess the use of experimentally estimated wall shear stresses to validate numerically predicted results. The most commonly cited haemodynamic factor implicated in the disease initiation and proliferation processes at graft/artery junctions is wall shear stress (WSS). WSS can be determined from the product of the viscosity of the fluid and the wall shear rate. Numerically, the wall shear rate is predicted using velocity values stored in the computational cell near the wall and assuming zero velocity at the wall. Experimentally, the wall shear rate is estimated by applying a curve-fit to near-wall velocity measurements and evaluating the shear rate at a specific distance from the wall. When estimating the wall shear rate from the laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) point velocity measurements, large differences between the experimentally estimated and numerically predicted WSSs were introduced. It was found that the estimated WSS distributions from the experimental results are highly dependent on the curve-fitting method used to calculate the wall shear rate. However, the velocity profiles for both the experimental and numerical investigations show extremely good comparison. It is concluded that numerical models should be validated using unprocessed LDA point velocity measurement and not estimated WSS values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-90
Number of pages14
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Volume217
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Curve-fitting
  • Laser Doppler anemometry
  • Wall shear stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On using experimentally estimated wall shear stresses to validate numerically predicted results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this