TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Bulk Average Velocity with Rigid Vegetation in Open Channels Using Tree‐Based Machine Learning
T2 - A Novel Approach Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence
AU - Meddage, D. P.P.
AU - Ekanayake, I. U.
AU - Herath, Sumudu
AU - Gobirahavan, R.
AU - Muttil, Nitin
AU - Rathnayake, Upaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Predicting the bulk‐average velocity (UB) in open channels with rigid vegetation is com-plicated due to the non‐linear nature of the parameters. Despite their higher accuracy, existing regression models fail to highlight the feature importance or causality of the respective predictions. Therefore, we propose a method to predict UB and the friction factor in the surface layer (fS) using tree‐based machine learning (ML) models (decision tree, extra tree, and XGBoost). Further, Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was used to interpret the ML predictions. The comparison empha-sized that the XGBoost model is superior in predicting UB (R = 0.984) and fS (R = 0.92) relative to the existing regression models. SHAP revealed the underlying reasoning behind predictions, the de-pendence of predictions, and feature importance. Interestingly, SHAP adheres to what is generally observed in complex flow behavior, thus, improving trust in predictions.
AB - Predicting the bulk‐average velocity (UB) in open channels with rigid vegetation is com-plicated due to the non‐linear nature of the parameters. Despite their higher accuracy, existing regression models fail to highlight the feature importance or causality of the respective predictions. Therefore, we propose a method to predict UB and the friction factor in the surface layer (fS) using tree‐based machine learning (ML) models (decision tree, extra tree, and XGBoost). Further, Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was used to interpret the ML predictions. The comparison empha-sized that the XGBoost model is superior in predicting UB (R = 0.984) and fS (R = 0.92) relative to the existing regression models. SHAP revealed the underlying reasoning behind predictions, the de-pendence of predictions, and feature importance. Interestingly, SHAP adheres to what is generally observed in complex flow behavior, thus, improving trust in predictions.
KW - bulk average velocity
KW - explainable artificial intelligence
KW - rigid vegetation
KW - tree‐based machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131574498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/s22124398
DO - 10.3390/s22124398
M3 - Article
C2 - 35746184
AN - SCOPUS:85131574498
SN - 1424-8220
VL - 22
JO - Sensors
JF - Sensors
IS - 12
M1 - 4398
ER -