Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality of life after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis

  • ATTRACT Trial Investigators
    • McGill University
    • McMaster University
    • Hamilton Health Sciences
    • University of Missouri at Kansas City
    • St Luke Hospital Kansas City
    • Inova Heart and Vascular Institute
    • Brigham and Women’s Hospital
    • Harvard University
    • Partners HealthCare
    • Providence St. Joseph Hospital, Orange
    • National Institutes of Health
    • Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology Partners/VSIR
    • Maine Medical Center
    • University of Pittsburgh
    • New York University
    • Portland Veterans Administration
    • Oregon Health and Science University
    • Washington University St. Louis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: After deep venous thrombosis (DVT), many patients have impaired quality of life (QOL). We aimed to assess whether pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) improves short-term or long-term QOL in patients with proximal DVT and whether QOL is related to extent of DVT. Methods: The Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) trial was an assessor-blinded randomized trial that compared PCDT with no PCDT in patients with DVT of the femoral, common femoral, or iliac veins. QOL was assessed at baseline and 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months using the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study on Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) disease-specific QOL measure and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary general QOL measures. Change in QOL scores from baseline to assessment time were compared in the PCDT and no PCDT treatment groups overall and in the iliofemoral DVT and femoral-popliteal DVT subgroups. Results: Of 692 ATTRACT patients, 691 were analyzed (mean age, 53 years; 62% male; 57% iliofemoral DVT). VEINES-QOL change scores were greater (ie, better) in PCDT vs no PCDT from baseline to 1 month (difference, 5.7; P = .0006) and from baseline to 6 months (5.1; P = .0029) but not for other intervals. SF-36 PCS change scores were greater in PCDT vs no PCDT from baseline to 1 month (difference, 2.4; P = .01) but not for other intervals. Among iliofemoral DVT patients, VEINES-QOL change scores from baseline to all assessments were greater in the PCDT vs no PCDT group; this was statistically significant in the intention-to-treat analysis at 1 month (difference, 10.0; P < .0001) and 6 months (8.8; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis at 18 months (difference, 5.8; P = .0086) and 24 months (difference, 6.6; P = .0067). SF-36 PCS change scores were greater in PCDT vs no PCDT from baseline to 1 month (difference, 3.2; P = .0010) but not for other intervals. In contrast, in femoral-popliteal DVT patients, change scores from baseline to all assessments were similar in the PCDT and no PCDT groups. Conclusions: Among patients with proximal DVT, PCDT leads to greater improvement in disease-specific QOL than no PCDT at 1 month and 6 months but not later. In patients with iliofemoral DVT, PCDT led to greater improvement in disease-specific QOL during 24 months.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)8-23.e18
    JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Keywords

    • Catheter-directed thrombolysis
    • Deep venous thrombosis
    • Femoral-popliteal DVT
    • Iliofemoral DVT
    • Proximal DVT
    • Quality of life
    • Randomized trial

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of life after pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for proximal deep venous thrombosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this