TY - JOUR
T1 - The use and interpretation of anthropometric measures in cancer epidemiology
T2 - A perspective from the world cancer research fund international continuous update project
AU - on behalf of the World Cancer Research Fund International Continuous Update Project Panel
AU - Bandera, Elisa V.
AU - Fay, Stephanie H.
AU - Giovannucci, Edward
AU - Leitzmann, Michael F.
AU - Marklew, Rachel
AU - McTiernan, Anne
AU - Mullee, Amy
AU - Romieu, Isabelle
AU - Thune, Inger
AU - Uauy, Ricardo
AU - Wiseman, Martin J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 UICC
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Anthropometric measures relating to body size, weight and composition are increasingly being associated with cancer risk and progression. Whilst practical in epidemiologic research, where population-level associations with disease are revealed, it is important to be aware that such measures are imperfect markers of the internal physiological processes that are the actual correlates of cancer development. Body mass index (BMI), the most commonly used marker for adiposity, may mask differences between lean and adipose tissue, or fat distribution, which varies across individuals, ethnicities, and stage in the lifespan. Other measures, such as weight gain in adulthood, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio, contribute information on adipose tissue distribution and insulin sensitivity. Single anthropometric measures do not capture maturational events, including the presence of critical windows of susceptibility (i.e., age of menarche and menopause), which presents a challenge in epidemiologic work. Integration of experimental research on underlying dynamic genetic, hormonal, and other non-nutritional mechanisms is necessary for a confident conclusion of the overall evidence in cancer development and progression. This article discusses the challenges confronted in evaluating and interpreting the current evidence linking anthropometric factors and cancer risk as a basis for issuing recommendations for cancer prevention.
AB - Anthropometric measures relating to body size, weight and composition are increasingly being associated with cancer risk and progression. Whilst practical in epidemiologic research, where population-level associations with disease are revealed, it is important to be aware that such measures are imperfect markers of the internal physiological processes that are the actual correlates of cancer development. Body mass index (BMI), the most commonly used marker for adiposity, may mask differences between lean and adipose tissue, or fat distribution, which varies across individuals, ethnicities, and stage in the lifespan. Other measures, such as weight gain in adulthood, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio, contribute information on adipose tissue distribution and insulin sensitivity. Single anthropometric measures do not capture maturational events, including the presence of critical windows of susceptibility (i.e., age of menarche and menopause), which presents a challenge in epidemiologic work. Integration of experimental research on underlying dynamic genetic, hormonal, and other non-nutritional mechanisms is necessary for a confident conclusion of the overall evidence in cancer development and progression. This article discusses the challenges confronted in evaluating and interpreting the current evidence linking anthropometric factors and cancer risk as a basis for issuing recommendations for cancer prevention.
KW - adiposity
KW - anthropometry
KW - body composition
KW - cancer
KW - height
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988000584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijc.30248
DO - 10.1002/ijc.30248
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27352197
AN - SCOPUS:84988000584
SN - 0020-7136
VL - 139
SP - 2391
EP - 2397
JO - International Journal of Cancer
JF - International Journal of Cancer
IS - 11
ER -