TY - JOUR
T1 - Using ELISA to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammal carcasses
T2 - a systematic literature review
AU - Ruy, P.
AU - McDevitt, A.
AU - O'Connor, I.
AU - O'Dwyer, K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Mammal Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Carcasses of wild mammals provide convenient samples for wildlife disease investigators. Specifically, antibodies can persist in the blood and tissues of animals up to a few days after death and can provide information on exposure to specific pathogens, including microorganisms with zoonotic implications, such as Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spp., Brucella spp., and Mycobacterium spp. Although screening samples from decaying wildlife for antibodies is not a new method, an overview of the literature with clear recommendations on best practices is lacking. Here, we present results from a systematic review of 115 studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammals across 298 individual research projects. We discuss the range of mammalian hosts and the pathogens most represented in the literature and suggest improvements to consider when using samples from decaying animals for seroinvestigation. Our results indicate that the most examined mammals were artiodactyl ungulates and that antibodies against the bacteria Brucella spp. are those most examined to date, followed by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, malignant catarrhal fever virus, Schmallenberg orthobunyavirus, and the coccidian Neospora caninum. The effect of haemolysis in serum samples on ELISA results was considered in only 3.7% of the research projects we reviewed, sample size decisions were not outlined in 83% of research projects, and half of the projects did not examine seroprevalence in different age classes. Nevertheless, these details are important for replicability and accurate interpretation of results. We highlight the benefits and limitations of detecting antibodies against pathogens in carcasses from wild mammalian groups. Wild mammals are reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens including those with zoonotic potential and investigating their carcasses can help wildlife investigators to better understand the epidemiology of many diseases with implications for wildlife, livestock, and human health.
AB - Carcasses of wild mammals provide convenient samples for wildlife disease investigators. Specifically, antibodies can persist in the blood and tissues of animals up to a few days after death and can provide information on exposure to specific pathogens, including microorganisms with zoonotic implications, such as Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spp., Brucella spp., and Mycobacterium spp. Although screening samples from decaying wildlife for antibodies is not a new method, an overview of the literature with clear recommendations on best practices is lacking. Here, we present results from a systematic review of 115 studies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammals across 298 individual research projects. We discuss the range of mammalian hosts and the pathogens most represented in the literature and suggest improvements to consider when using samples from decaying animals for seroinvestigation. Our results indicate that the most examined mammals were artiodactyl ungulates and that antibodies against the bacteria Brucella spp. are those most examined to date, followed by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, malignant catarrhal fever virus, Schmallenberg orthobunyavirus, and the coccidian Neospora caninum. The effect of haemolysis in serum samples on ELISA results was considered in only 3.7% of the research projects we reviewed, sample size decisions were not outlined in 83% of research projects, and half of the projects did not examine seroprevalence in different age classes. Nevertheless, these details are important for replicability and accurate interpretation of results. We highlight the benefits and limitations of detecting antibodies against pathogens in carcasses from wild mammalian groups. Wild mammals are reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens including those with zoonotic potential and investigating their carcasses can help wildlife investigators to better understand the epidemiology of many diseases with implications for wildlife, livestock, and human health.
KW - epidemiology
KW - One Health
KW - seroprevalence
KW - wildlife
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206002801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/mam.12379
DO - 10.1111/mam.12379
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85206002801
SN - 0305-1838
JO - Mammal Review
JF - Mammal Review
ER -