Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit

  • the VIP1 study group
    • Sorbonne University
    • University of Bergen
    • Hospital Ancelle di Cremona
    • Geriatric Research Group
    • Ålesund Hospital
    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
    • Autonomous University of Barcelona
    • IRCCS Istituto di ricerche farmacologiche Mario Negri - Milano, Bergamo, Ranica
    • St George’s University Hospital
    • Aarhus University (AU)
    • Niguarda Hospital
    • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
    • University College Dublin
    • Hospital São José
    • Ghent University Hospital
    • Karolinska Institutet
    • University of Geneva
    • Utrecht University
    • Jagiellonian University Medical College
    • Kardinal Schwarzenberg Hospital
    • University of Thessaly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    142 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: To document and analyse the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) in a population of very old patients admitted to the ICU. Methods: This prospective study included intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years in 309 ICUs from 21 European countries with 30-day mortality follow-up. Results: LST limitation was identified in 1356/5021 (27.2%) of patients: 15% had a withholding decision and 12.2% a withdrawal decision (including those with a previous withholding decision). Patients with LST limitation were older, more frail, more severely ill and less frequently electively admitted. Patients with withdrawal of LST were more frequently male and had a longer ICU length of stay. The ICU and 30-day mortality were, respectively, 29.1 and 53.1% in the withholding group and 82.2% and 93.1% in the withdrawal group. LST was less frequently limited in eastern and southern European countries than in northern Europe. The patient-independent factors associated with LST limitation were: acute ICU admission (OR 5.77, 95% CI 4.32–7.7), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78–2.42), increased age (each 5 years of increase in age had a OR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.12–1.34) and SOFA score [OR of 1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.09 per point)]. The frequency of LST limitation was higher in countries with high GDP and was lower in religious countries. Conclusions: The most important patient variables associated with the instigation of LST limitation were acute admission, frailty, age, admission SOFA score and country. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NTC03134807).

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1027-1038
    Number of pages12
    JournalIntensive Care Medicine
    Volume44
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

    Keywords

    • Elderly
    • Ethics
    • Intensive care
    • Life sustaining treatment
    • Withdrawal
    • Withholding

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this